We are the Sitecore to Sanity migration experts

Challenges with Sitecore

Sitecore’s complexity can pose challenges, particularly during the initial setup and configuration phases, which require significant technical expertise. Its cost structure may be prohibitive for smaller organisations, given the investment needed for licensing and ongoing maintenance. Additionally, the platform’s advanced features and customisation options can lead to lengthy implementation timelines. Users might also face a steep learning curve, and reliance on specialised development resources can further increase the time and costs associated with deploying and managing Sitecore solutions.

Key Pain Points

•Complex initial setup
•Requires technical expertise
•High licensing costs
•Expensive for smaller organisations
•Lengthy implementation timelines
•Steep learning curve
•Significant maintenance demands
•Reliance on specialised resources
•Costly development processes
•Extended deployment times
•Challenging configuration processes
•High total cost of ownership

Benefits of Sanity

You know where our bias' lies. We think Sanity is literally the best headless content management out there. The schema is code-based, so it can be easily versioned, scaled and extended without a heap of third-party hoops to jump.

It's got Live Content API, which is unbeatable for previews on the market - it means you hit the publish button and it's live, no waiting for build times, no issues with caching and uncaching data, one singular API usage that scales perfectly.

It also offers one of the best editorial experiences in the industry with Presentation. We've always been huge fans of it, and we've pivoted our business with it when we realised how ahead it is.