sitecore-logo.svg
contentstack-logo.svg

We are the Sitecore to Contentstack migration experts


Challenges with Sitecore

Sitecore’s complexity can pose challenges, particularly during the initial setup and configuration phases, which require significant technical expertise. Its cost structure may be prohibitive for smaller organisations, given the investment needed for licensing and ongoing maintenance. Additionally, the platform’s advanced features and customisation options can lead to lengthy implementation timelines. Users might also face a steep learning curve, and reliance on specialised development resources can further increase the time and costs associated with deploying and managing Sitecore solutions.

Key Pain Points

  • Complex initial setup
  • Requires technical expertise
  • High licensing costs
  • Expensive for smaller organisations
  • Lengthy implementation timelines
  • Steep learning curve
  • Significant maintenance demands
  • Reliance on specialised resources
  • Costly development processes
  • Extended deployment times
  • Challenging configuration processes
  • High total cost of ownership

Benefits of Contentstack

Contentstack is one of the more polished enterprise headless CMS platforms. It has API-first, composable, and loaded with the usual DXP buzzwords. It actually backs some of it up. The workflows are strong, role-based approvals are genuinely helpful for large editorial teams, and the visual builder plus modular blocks give marketers enough power to ship pages without pinging developers every 30 seconds. Its omnichannel delivery, multi-region CDNs, and fast APIs make it a solid fit for global brands with heavy traffic and complex localisation needs.

But this is firmly in enterprise territory. We generally don’t recommend platforms in the “DXP with 47 whitepapers” category, but if you must pick one, Contentstack at least has a smoother developer experience than most. The composable architecture is well thought out, integrations behave predictably, and the SDKs play nicely with modern frameworks like Next.js. If you're a Fortune-500-sized team and want help figuring out whether this is the right bet, or want a modern alternative instead, get in touch.

Key advantages

feature 5.png

Enterprise-grade composable architecture

Built for large teams shipping across markets. The stack scales fast, stays stable under heavy traffic, and doesn’t crumble the moment your marketing team schedules a global launch.

feature 6.png

Advanced workflow and approvals

Contentstack’s workflow engine handles multi-step approvals, roles, and governance without duct tape. Perfect for teams that need structure instead of Slack chaos.

Performance-first architecture.png

Multi-region CDN delivery

Your content gets pushed worldwide through edge CDNs, keeping delivery fast even when your customers are nowhere near your servers.

Omnichannel-ready (2).png

API-first microservices design

Developers get flexibility without wrestling with legacy monolith logic with REST, GraphQL, and webhooks.

potentially high resource demand.png

Extensive React/Next.js SDKs

Strong developer tooling means faster builds and fewer hours wasted writing boilerplate just to fetch and render content.

limited out-of-box solutions (1).png

MACH-compliant infrastructure

Fully modular, cloud-native, and replaceable in parts. Plays nicely inside modern composable stacks instead of dragging you back to 2010.

Get in touch

Book a meeting with us to discuss how we can help or fill out a form to get in touch