Case Study
View Case StudyTray.ai
Migrating hundreds of thousands of pages, re-platforming and extending for the leading composable AI integration platform
From Dato CMS to Payload
We are the Dato CMS to Payload migration experts
Last verified:
Challenges with Dato CMS
Key pain points
DatoCMS gives all the vibes of Prismic, but is somehow less flexible. It can feel like a glorified drag-and-drop schema builder. The moment you want to do anything mildly custom, the walls start closing in. And yes, the pricing stings. It scales fast, which is great for Dato, not so great for anyone trying to run a startup without selling a kidney.
The ecosystem is small, the extensions are thin, and deeper customisation often turns into "well, I guess we're building that ourselves." There's no hard spend cap — DatoCMS confirmed overages accumulate automatically on paid plans with no way to set a budget limit, so surprise bills are a real risk. Once your project grows, you quickly realise drag-and-drop doesn't magically give you validation or extensibility. If you need something genuinely custom or long-term scalable, there are better choices. Just contact us before you start one of the most expensive journeys.
Limited customisation options
DatoCMS hits a ceiling fast if you need deeply custom logic. The drag-and-drop model is convenient, but it doesn't give you the freedom a code-first setup would.
Pricing based on traffic
Costs scale with usage, which can get painful quickly for growing sites. Traffic spikes = surprise bills, and there's no hard spending cap to protect you.
Steeper learning curve
While the UI is simple, the API-driven side demands more technical understanding. Non-developers may struggle once things get complex.
Need for additional plugins
Out-of-the-box features only go so far. More advanced workflows often require plugins or custom development to bridge gaps.
Limited feature set scalability
Great for small–mid projects, but larger, more demanding setups can outgrow what DatoCMS offers out of the box.
Potential integration issues
Certain frameworks and tools need careful configuration, and edge cases appear more often than you'd expect in more mature CMS ecosystems.
Benefits of Payload
Key advantages
Payload is genuinely strong tech. It’s fast, open-source, developer-first, and perfect if you want full control over your content model. The Next.js integration is smooth, the admin UI is clean, and it’s one of the more flexible modern CMS options if your team prefers to build things exactly the way you want them.
Just know that if you want actual features like visual editing, Vercel Blob storage, image handling, etc, you’ll be paying extra for the privilege. If you’re considering Payload or thinking about migrating into (or out of) it, reach out to us. We can help you figure out whether it’s the right stack or guide you toward a cleaner, saner (Sanity) setup.
Integration with Next.js applications
Payload works natively with Next.js, giving you clean data fetching and a smooth development flow. It removes the usual CMS friction so you can build fast, modern frontends without hacks.
Fully customizable
Everything is configured in code, which means you can tailor the CMS to your exact use case. You define the logic, workflows, and behaviour.
Supports custom data models
You can design any content structure your project needs, from simple documents to complex relational models. This gives you full control over how content is organised and delivered.
Intuitive admin UI
Payload’s admin panel is simple, clean, and fast. Editors can create, update, and manage content without training or digging through confusing menus.
Custom plugins and APIs
You can extend Payload however you like. Build custom fields, integrate external services, or add your own API routes. Perfect for teams that need deeper project-specific functionality.
Built-in authentication
Payload comes with user auth, roles, and access control baked in. No external auth service needed, and you can customise permissions to match your editorial workflow.
Common questions
Dato CMS to Payload migration FAQs
Answers to the most common questions about Dato CMS to Payload migration
How does DatoCMS compare to other headless CMS platforms?
DatoCMS sits in an interesting middle ground. The UI is polished and editors pick it up fast, which puts it ahead of more developer-centric options like Hygraph or Strapi. The image pipeline is genuinely excellent, with automatic optimisation and responsive transformations built in. Visual Editing launched in February 2026, so editors can now click directly on page elements to make changes with real-time updates — available on all plans including Free. Where it still falls short is customisation depth. Compared to Sanity, you hit ceilings sooner when you need custom validation, unique editorial workflows, or deeply nested content structures. Compared to Contentful, DatoCMS is cheaper at lower tiers but has a smaller plugin ecosystem. It's a solid choice for small to mid-sized projects, but larger builds tend to outgrow it.
What does DatoCMS pricing look like as traffic grows?
DatoCMS pricing is tied to API calls and bandwidth, which means costs scale with your traffic. The free tier includes 100k Content Delivery API calls per month and 10GB of bandwidth. Separately, the Developer plan Content Management API limit was raised to 25k monthly calls in April 2026. The Professional plan runs €199/month on a monthly basis, or €149/month billed annually, with higher limits including 1M CDA API calls and 1TB bandwidth per month. The Enterprise tier is custom-priced. One real concern worth flagging is that there is no hard spending cap. DatoCMS confirmed in their community forum that paid plans let overages accumulate automatically with no way to set a budget limit — so a traffic spike or viral post can generate surprise bills without warning. Set up API caching aggressively and lean on static generation to keep costs predictable. If budget guardrails are critical to your team, factor that in before committing.
Is DatoCMS good for non-technical content editors?
For basic content editing, yes. DatoCMS has one of the cleaner editor interfaces in the headless CMS space. Drag-and-drop schema building means content teams can understand the structure visually, and the media library is well-designed. Visual Editing — launched February 2026 across all plans — now lets editors click directly on live page elements rather than switching to a separate preview environment, which closes a long-standing gap. The issues that remain are around scale. Editors managing content across multiple locales find the interface gets cluttered. The Structured Text editor has been noted as slow on very long documents with heavy hyperlink use (a bug patched in April 2026, so recent versions should be fine). For teams coming from WordPress or HubSpot, the shift away from WYSIWYG-first thinking is still an adjustment, but Visual Editing reduces the friction considerably.
What should you watch out for when migrating from DatoCMS?
The migration path out of DatoCMS is cleaner than most. Both GraphQL and REST APIs give you full content access, so extraction is straightforward. Schema mapping is the main planning task, since DatoCMS's modular content blocks need to be translated to whatever structure your target CMS uses. The thing to watch is image URLs. DatoCMS serves images through its own CDN with transformation parameters baked into the URL, so you'll need to re-upload assets and update references across your content. Budget 3-6 weeks for a typical DatoCMS migration. If you're using their Structured Text field type, allocate extra time to convert that into your new CMS's rich text format.
How hard is it to migrate away from Payload CMS?
Payload stores content in MongoDB or Postgres, so extracting your data is straightforward compared to proprietary platforms. The real work is restructuring your content model for the target CMS and rebuilding any custom access control logic you've written. We typically complete Payload migrations in 3 to 6 weeks depending on how much custom backend logic is involved. The code-first nature of Payload means most of the content model is well-documented in your own codebase, which actually makes migration planning easier.
What are the main reasons teams leave Payload?
The most common reasons we hear are infrastructure fatigue and ecosystem gaps. Payload requires you to manage your own database, hosting, auth, and scaling. Teams that chose Payload for its developer flexibility eventually realise they're spending more time on DevOps than on content features. The Figma acquisition in 2024 also shifted priorities, and some teams feel the platform's direction became less predictable. Visual editing and live preview still require significant custom engineering compared to platforms that ship them natively.
What does a Payload to Sanity migration cost?
For a typical content site with 200 to 1,000 documents, we estimate 4 to 6 weeks of work. The bulk of effort goes into rebuilding the admin experience and frontend integration, not the data transfer itself. Payload's MongoDB exports are clean, so content migration scripts run reliably. The cost depends heavily on how much custom auth logic and access control you've built, since that needs to be rebuilt in the target platform's permission system. We scope every migration individually after reviewing your Payload config.
Get in touch
Fill out the form below and we'll get back to you
