We are the Strapi to Sanity migration experts

Challenges with Strapi

Despite Strapi’s strengths, it can present a steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with its Node.js environment. Maintaining the environment is an unnecessary headache, in our opinion.

Its dependency on developer expertise might pose challenges for smaller teams lacking technical skills. Being focused on headless architecture, Strapi may not cater to users seeking traditional CMS features out of the box. Additionally, users may encounter limitations with certain plugins or require custom development to fully realise project-specific requirements, potentially impacting initial setup time and cost efficiency.

Key Pain Points

•Steep learning curve
•Node.js knowledge required
•Developer expertise necessary
•Limited traditional CMS features
•Plugin limitations
•Custom development needs
•Longer initial setup
•Cost-efficiency concerns
•Smaller team challenges
•Dependency on integrations
•Requires technical resources
•Out-of-the-box feature gap

Benefits of Sanity

You know where our bias' lies. We think Sanity is literally the best headless content management out there. The schema is code-based, so it can be easily versioned, scaled and extended without a heap of third-party hoops to jump.

It's got Live Content API, which is unbeatable for previews on the market - it means you hit the publish button and it's live, no waiting for build times, no issues with caching and uncaching data, one singular API usage that scales perfectly.

It also offers one of the best editorial experiences in the industry with Presentation. We've always been huge fans of it, and we've pivoted our business with it when we realised how ahead it is.