Case study
View case studyJamb
We rebuilt Jamb on Sanity and Next.js, merging two legacy PHP sites into one calm catalogue without losing the SEO equity their antique and reproduction collections had built up.
From Kentico to Contentstack
We are the Kentico to Contentstack migration experts
Last verified:
Challenges with Kentico
Key pain points
Here’s the reality check about Kentico. It isn’t cheap. Licensing, implementation, and support can feel like a CFO jump-scare. And while the interface is friendly at first glance, once you get into migrations, upgrades, or deeper customisation, things get… heavy.
Major version updates can introduce breaking changes, permissions get messy at scale, and multi-tenant setups mean one bug can take down every project sharing the stack. The docs and community aren’t as deep as the open-source world either, so when something goes wrong, you’ll likely need a developer rather than a forum thread to save you. If you can absorb the overhead and like Corporate Memphis art, go ahead. But before you go ahead, give us a call, and we will try to set up a better solution for you.
Steep learning curve
Kentico’s power comes with complexity. Newcomers and smaller teams often need time (and developers) to actually start working.
High cost for licenses and maintenance
Licensing and maintenance can add up quickly, which makes Kentico a harder sell for startups or smaller organizations.
Upgrades can get messy
Major version jumps, migrations, or deep API changes sometimes introduce breaking changes, which, trust us, is not fun if your site has years of custom logic.
UI feels dated at scale
As projects grow, the dashboard can get cluttered and less intuitive. It works, but it’s not winning design awards, unless you are still competing in 2015.
Limited community support.
Support exists, but the ecosystem isn’t as loud or as active as WordPress (not our first choice), Webflow, or headless-first platforms like Sanity.
Customizations risk impacting all sites
In multitenant setups, a poorly built custom feature can impact every site in the cluster, which means you can't move or change a single line of code, unless you love 404 messages.
Benefits of Contentstack
Key advantages
Contentstack is one of the more polished enterprise headless CMS platforms. It has API-first, composable, and loaded with the usual DXP buzzwords. It actually backs some of it up. The workflows are strong, role-based approvals are genuinely helpful for large editorial teams, and the visual builder plus modular blocks give marketers enough power to ship pages without pinging developers every 30 seconds. Its omnichannel delivery, multi-region CDNs, and fast APIs make it a solid fit for global brands with heavy traffic and complex localisation needs.
But this is firmly in enterprise territory. We generally don’t recommend platforms in the “DXP with 47 whitepapers” category, but if you must pick one, Contentstack at least has a smoother developer experience than most. The composable architecture is well thought out, integrations behave predictably, and the SDKs play nicely with modern frameworks like Next.js. If you're a Fortune-500-sized team and want help figuring out whether this is the right bet, or want a modern alternative instead, get in touch.
Enterprise-grade composable architecture
Built for large teams shipping across markets. The stack scales fast, stays stable under heavy traffic, and doesn’t crumble the moment your marketing team schedules a global launch.
Advanced workflow and approvals
Contentstack’s workflow engine handles multi-step approvals, roles, and governance without duct tape. Perfect for teams that need structure instead of Slack chaos.
Multi-region CDN delivery
Your content gets pushed worldwide through edge CDNs, keeping delivery fast even when your customers are nowhere near your servers.
API-first microservices design
Developers get flexibility without wrestling with legacy monolith logic with REST, GraphQL, and webhooks.
Extensive React/Next.js SDKs
Strong developer tooling means faster builds and fewer hours wasted writing boilerplate just to fetch and render content.
MACH-compliant infrastructure
Fully modular, cloud-native, and replaceable in parts. Plays nicely inside modern composable stacks instead of dragging you back to 2010.
Common questions
Kentico to Contentstack migration FAQs
Answers to the most common questions about Kentico to Contentstack migration
How much does a Kentico migration typically cost?
Kentico migrations are enterprise-scale projects. For a site with 1,000 to 10,000 pages, expect the migration itself to run 8 to 16 weeks of development time. The cost depends on how deeply you've customised Kentico's marketing automation, e-commerce, and workflow features. Simple content-only migrations are faster, but most Kentico installations have years of custom .NET logic that needs to be rebuilt or replaced. We've seen total migration budgets range from $30,000 to $150,000 depending on scope, which still often pays for itself within 18 months through reduced licensing and maintenance costs.
Why are companies migrating away from Kentico?
Licensing costs are the initial trigger for most conversations we have. Kentico's annual fees add up fast, especially when you include maintenance, hosting, and the cost of .NET developers to keep it running. But the deeper issue is agility. Major version upgrades introduce breaking changes that can destabilise sites with years of custom logic. The admin UI feels dated as projects scale. Multi-tenant setups carry real risk since one bad customisation can take down every site in the cluster. Teams eventually decide the operational overhead isn't worth it.
What's the biggest challenge when migrating from Kentico?
Untangling the all-in-one features. Kentico bundles marketing automation, e-commerce, analytics, workflows, and content management into one platform. When you migrate away, each of those capabilities needs a new home. Content goes to your new CMS, email automation might move to a tool like Resend or Customer.io, and e-commerce might need a dedicated platform. We map out every feature your team actually uses before writing a single migration script, because the biggest risk is discovering a dependency mid-project that nobody documented.
How much does Contentstack cost?
Contentstack doesn't publish pricing, which is standard for enterprise DXP platforms and frustrating for everyone else. Based on what we've seen, expect the entry point for a small team to start around $3,000-$5,000/month, with enterprise contracts landing in the $50,000-$150,000+ per year range depending on API usage, regions, and seats. Implementation costs run separately and typically require 8-16 weeks of developer time. If you're comparing against Contentful or Sanity at the enterprise level, Contentstack is generally in the same ballpark as Contentful but significantly more expensive than Sanity for comparable functionality.
Is Contentstack worth the investment for mid-sized teams?
For most mid-sized teams, no. Contentstack was built for Fortune 500 content operations with global teams, complex approval chains, and multi-region delivery requirements. If your team has 5-15 people managing content across 2-3 markets, you're paying enterprise prices for capabilities you'll never fully use. The workflows and governance tools are genuinely good, but they come with complexity overhead that slows smaller teams down. We typically steer mid-sized companies toward Sanity or Contentful, which offer strong workflow controls without the enterprise onboarding burden. Contentstack makes sense when you have 50+ content editors across multiple regions. Below that threshold, leaner platforms deliver more value per dollar.
How hard is it to migrate off Contentstack?
Harder than most headless CMS platforms because of the custom integration layer. Contentstack's composable architecture means teams typically build extensive webhook pipelines, custom extensions, and multi-step workflows that all live within the platform. Content extraction through their REST and GraphQL APIs is straightforward, but replicating the orchestration logic elsewhere takes real engineering effort. Schema migration is manageable if your content models are well-documented. Plan for 8-14 weeks for a full migration. The longest phase is usually rebuilding the approval workflows and publication pipelines in the target platform, since Contentstack's workflow engine is one of its strongest features and the part teams rely on most.
What should enterprise teams consider before choosing Contentstack?
Ask three questions first. Do you actually need multi-region CDN delivery and MACH-compliant architecture, or is that just nice to have? If you're serving one market from one region, you're paying for global infrastructure you won't use. Second, does your editorial team have the patience for a steep onboarding curve? Contentstack's content modelling is powerful but requires careful upfront architecture. Third, what's your exit strategy? Contentstack contracts often span multiple years, and the custom integrations you build create switching costs that grow over time. We always recommend running a proof-of-concept with real content before signing an annual contract. That 2-week investment can save you from a 2-year mistake.
Get in touch
Tell us what you're building. We reply within one working day — Jono or someone on the team picks up every message personally.
