Case Study
View Case StudyTray.ai
Migrating hundreds of thousands of pages, re-platforming and extending for the leading composable AI integration platform
From Framer to Contentstack
We are the Framer to Contentstack migration experts
Last verified:
Challenges with Framer
Key pain points
Framer looks incredible until you ask it to behave like a real CMS. The moment you go beyond a tiny blog or a five-page marketing site, the cracks show fast.
The CMS is bare-bones, the editor eats half your screen. Let's not forget the slow previews, sticky panels, and random bugs that make you question your life choices.
And then there’s the pricing. The entry-level CMS plan caps you at one collection, and once you start getting traffic or adding more collections, you move into $20–$40+ per collection per month territory. Framer simply isn’t built for deep structures, complex logic, or anything resembling enterprise workflows. If you’re already knee-deep in a Framer setup and not sure whether to scale, switch, or salvage, reach out to us. We’ll help you figure out the smartest path forward (and save you from the pain).
Basic CMS
Framer’s CMS works for blogs and small sites, but anything bigger starts to feel cramped. If you are looking for complex structures, relationships, or enterprise-level content operations, you’ll hit the walls quickly.
Not built for serious eCommerce
It can handle a simple store, but anything custom, multi-variant, or large-scale becomes a hackathon. If you’re planning real eCommerce, you’ll want something sturdier.
Only friendly for designers
If you’ve never touched design tools, the UI has a learning curve, and there’s no deep tutorial to hold your hand. You’re on your own after the basics.
Limited advanced features
Things like user roles, workflows, or deep automation are difficult on Framer. Great for designers; less great for anyone who needs serious operational features.
Small plugin ecosystem
The community is growing, but nowhere near Webflow or mature CMS platforms. If you need niche integrations or extensions, expect roadblocks or custom work.
Not suited for complex or multi-language sites
As soon as you need structured data, heavy localisation, or custom code, Framer starts to feel restrictive. Headless CMS platforms handle this far better.
Benefits of Contentstack
Key advantages
Contentstack is one of the more polished enterprise headless CMS platforms. It has API-first, composable, and loaded with the usual DXP buzzwords. It actually backs some of it up. The workflows are strong, role-based approvals are genuinely helpful for large editorial teams, and the visual builder plus modular blocks give marketers enough power to ship pages without pinging developers every 30 seconds. Its omnichannel delivery, multi-region CDNs, and fast APIs make it a solid fit for global brands with heavy traffic and complex localisation needs.
But this is firmly in enterprise territory. We generally don’t recommend platforms in the “DXP with 47 whitepapers” category, but if you must pick one, Contentstack at least has a smoother developer experience than most. The composable architecture is well thought out, integrations behave predictably, and the SDKs play nicely with modern frameworks like Next.js. If you're a Fortune-500-sized team and want help figuring out whether this is the right bet, or want a modern alternative instead, get in touch.
Enterprise-grade composable architecture
Built for large teams shipping across markets. The stack scales fast, stays stable under heavy traffic, and doesn’t crumble the moment your marketing team schedules a global launch.
Advanced workflow and approvals
Contentstack’s workflow engine handles multi-step approvals, roles, and governance without duct tape. Perfect for teams that need structure instead of Slack chaos.
Multi-region CDN delivery
Your content gets pushed worldwide through edge CDNs, keeping delivery fast even when your customers are nowhere near your servers.
API-first microservices design
Developers get flexibility without wrestling with legacy monolith logic with REST, GraphQL, and webhooks.
Extensive React/Next.js SDKs
Strong developer tooling means faster builds and fewer hours wasted writing boilerplate just to fetch and render content.
MACH-compliant infrastructure
Fully modular, cloud-native, and replaceable in parts. Plays nicely inside modern composable stacks instead of dragging you back to 2010.
Common questions
Framer to Contentstack migration FAQs
Answers to the most common questions about Framer to Contentstack migration
How much does Framer cost for a real website?
Framer's free plan is heavily restricted (2 pages, framer.site subdomain, Framer branding). The Mini plan is $5/month (billed yearly), Basic is $15/month, and Pro is $30/month. Where costs escalate is the CMS. The basic CMS plan limits you to 1 collection, and adding more collections pushes you into $20-$40+ per collection per month. For a site with a blog, case studies, and a team directory (three collections), you're looking at $90-$150/month before any custom domain or analytics add-ons. That's not cheap for what is essentially a visual website builder. Compare that to a headless CMS on a free tier plus $20/month Vercel hosting, and the math starts working against Framer quickly.
Can you move a Framer site to a headless CMS without losing the design?
Yes, and we've done this for several clients. The design itself translates well to a modern frontend because Framer sites are essentially CSS layouts with animations. We rebuild the visual design in Next.js (or whatever framework fits), which usually produces a faster, more performant version of the same site. CMS content exports from Framer's collections through their API, though the data structures are simple so the migration is straightforward. Animations need manual recreation using a library like Motion for React, but the results are typically better than Framer's output. The whole process takes 4-8 weeks for a typical marketing site.
What are the best alternatives to Framer for a growing company?
It depends on what you're outgrowing. If you want to keep the visual editing experience, Webflow offers more CMS depth and ecommerce capabilities, though it has its own scaling limitations. If you want full control, a headless CMS (Sanity is our pick) paired with Next.js gives you unlimited flexibility in content modelling, design, and performance. Builder.io is worth considering if your marketing team needs to build pages independently, though the vendor lock-in is a concern. For most growing companies, we recommend the headless CMS plus custom frontend route because it scales without platform ceilings and your design is never limited by what a visual builder supports.
When should you stop using Framer and switch to something else?
Three signals tell you it's time. First, your CMS needs exceed what collections can handle. If you need relational content, structured data beyond flat lists, or more than a handful of collection types, Framer's CMS will hold you back. Second, performance. Framer sites can get sluggish with heavy animations and large pages, and you have limited control over optimisation. Third, development workflows. If your team includes developers who want version control, CI/CD pipelines, and the ability to write custom logic, Framer's no-code environment becomes a constraint. We've migrated Framer sites for companies that hit all three of these walls simultaneously, usually around the 20-30 page mark with 3+ content types.
How much does Contentstack cost?
Contentstack doesn't publish pricing, which is standard for enterprise DXP platforms and frustrating for everyone else. Based on what we've seen, expect the entry point for a small team to start around $3,000-$5,000/month, with enterprise contracts landing in the $50,000-$150,000+ per year range depending on API usage, regions, and seats. Implementation costs run separately and typically require 8-16 weeks of developer time. If you're comparing against Contentful or Sanity at the enterprise level, Contentstack is generally in the same ballpark as Contentful but significantly more expensive than Sanity for comparable functionality.
Is Contentstack worth the investment for mid-sized teams?
For most mid-sized teams, no. Contentstack was built for Fortune 500 content operations with global teams, complex approval chains, and multi-region delivery requirements. If your team has 5-15 people managing content across 2-3 markets, you're paying enterprise prices for capabilities you'll never fully use. The workflows and governance tools are genuinely good, but they come with complexity overhead that slows smaller teams down. We typically steer mid-sized companies toward Sanity or Contentful, which offer strong workflow controls without the enterprise onboarding burden. Contentstack makes sense when you have 50+ content editors across multiple regions. Below that threshold, leaner platforms deliver more value per dollar.
How hard is it to migrate off Contentstack?
Harder than most headless CMS platforms because of the custom integration layer. Contentstack's composable architecture means teams typically build extensive webhook pipelines, custom extensions, and multi-step workflows that all live within the platform. Content extraction through their REST and GraphQL APIs is straightforward, but replicating the orchestration logic elsewhere takes real engineering effort. Schema migration is manageable if your content models are well-documented. Plan for 8-14 weeks for a full migration. The longest phase is usually rebuilding the approval workflows and publication pipelines in the target platform, since Contentstack's workflow engine is one of its strongest features and the part teams rely on most.
What should enterprise teams consider before choosing Contentstack?
Ask three questions first. Do you actually need multi-region CDN delivery and MACH-compliant architecture, or is that just nice to have? If you're serving one market from one region, you're paying for global infrastructure you won't use. Second, does your editorial team have the patience for a steep onboarding curve? Contentstack's content modelling is powerful but requires careful upfront architecture. Third, what's your exit strategy? Contentstack contracts often span multiple years, and the custom integrations you build create switching costs that grow over time. We always recommend running a proof-of-concept with real content before signing an annual contract. That 2-week investment can save you from a 2-year mistake.
Get in touch
Fill out the form below and we'll get back to you
