Skip to content




Hygraph logo
Framer logo

From Hygraph to Framer

We are the Hygraph to Framer migration experts

Last verified:


The process

How we migrate from Hygraph to Framer

  1. 01

    Access and gating audit

    First we check the existing Hygraph and see whether the data is clean enough to move straight over to Framer, and plan around any auth walls or bot protection in the way.

  2. 02

    Rendering assessment and extraction

    Then we work out how Hygraph renders its pages and pull the content out, even without CMS access.

  3. 03

    AI-assisted sanitization

    Everything extracted runs through our sanitization pipeline, which flags slop, normalizes structure, and leaves us clean content to work with.

  4. 04

    Content-model design with the client

    Before anything moves, we agree the Framer content model with you, shaped around how your editors actually work.

  5. 05

    Transform and soft-migrate

    We transform the content to the agreed schema and run a full dry run, so mappings and edge cases prove out before production.

  6. 06

    Execute the real migration

    Once the dry run is clean, everything moves into Framer in one controlled cutover.

  7. 07

    Redirect mapping and throttled sitemap submission

    Every old URL gets mapped to its new home with the right redirect, so rankings and link equity survive the move.

  8. 08

    Agentic-browser QA

    Finally, automated browsers sweep the new site for data issues, design regressions, and missing SEO signals.

  9. Ready when you are. We'll bring the moving boxes.Start my migration


Challenges with Hygraph

Key pain points

GraphQL-only is the core trade-off. If your team hasn't worked with GraphQL, expect a ramp-up period, and simple projects can end up feeling more complex than they need to be. The UI slows down once your dataset grows, especially with dozens of fields or multiple locales. Localization works, but past ten languages the interface starts to feel like a spreadsheet that lost a fight.

Integrations take more effort if the rest of your stack is REST. There's no REST endpoint, so you'll write adapters or a BFF layer. Pricing is the other thing to plan for. The Growth plan at $199/month includes 1M API operations, and metered overages stack up quickly on a busy site once you cross that line. Enterprise is the only way to unlock SSO, custom roles, and higher locale counts.

If you're unsure whether Hygraph is the right fit, or you're stuck halfway up the learning curve, reach out. We can help you map the cleanest path forward.

Help me migrate


GraphQL learning curve barrier

You have to really love GraphQL

GraphQL is one of its strongest point but it can be your downfall as well, if your team hasn’t touched GraphQL before, expect a ramp-up period. It’s powerful but definitely not "plug in and go."

Large dataset performance issues

Large dataset performance issues

Once your project grows, the Hygraph UI can start dragging. Big data collections need extra optimization to stay usable.

Interface sluggishness at scale

Interface sluggishness at scale

Heavy models, long lists, and asset-heavy projects can make the dashboard feel slow, especially for editors.

Localization workflow complexity

Localization workflow complexity

Managing multiple locales works, but it’s not as intuitive as it looks on paper. Some teams find themselves clicking around more than expected.

Multi-language interface clutter

Multi-language interface clutter

Multi-language setups work fine, but as soon as you hit double-digit locales, the UI quickly becomes noisy and harder to manage. It’s usable, just not optimised for scale.

REST API integration challenges

REST API integration challenges

If your systems still rely on REST, be prepared for extra engineering. Hygraph is GraphQL-only, so adapters and rework are part of the deal.



Benefits of Framer

Key advantages

If you live in Figma all day, Framer is the right choice for you. You can import your layouts, tweak a few interactions, hit publish, and suddenly you’ve "built a website" without ever opening VS Code. The no-code editor is fast, the animations look like you actually care about UI, and the built-in hosting + global CDN means you never have to touch a server or pretend you know what an SSL certificate is.

Multiple people can jump in, rewrite copy, adjust layouts, and preview the site instantly in real time with zero handoff pain, and "can you push this to staging?" nonsense. The SEO defaults are strong, images automatically behave, and performance is fast without you having to obsess over Lighthouse scores.

Can't knock the service, but we're here when you're looking to build something more scalable.

Start my migration


Drag and drop Framer

Ability to control layout with drag and drop

You can drag, drop, and publish without the need for any developer or having experience in website development. With Framer, you can easily turn your mockup into a working page.

Quick and cheap to build something

Quick and cheap to build something

If you need a site yesterday (and on a budget), go ahead with Framer. You can go from a Figma-level idea to a live marketing page in a few hours without writing any code or having developers wait on stand-ups.

Some optimization comes by default

Some optimization comes by default

Framer quietly handles things like image compression, semantic markup, and basic SEO hygiene. You ship quickly, and the site doesn't fall apart in Lighthouse analyses.

Huge library of themes

Huge library of themes

You can pick a template, tweak a few components, and you’re basically done. Its theme library is stacked, and most of it looks "portfolio ready" right out of the box.

Real-time team collaboration

Real-time team collaboration

Multiple people can jump in, edit, comment, and tweak designs live like Figma. It speeds up feedback loops and kills the endless back-and-forth.

Intuitive, designer-friendly UI

Intuitive, designer-friendly UI

If you know your way around Figma, you’ll be able to use Framer without any difficulty. Framer’s interface is simple, and keeps designers moving without begging a developer for help.





Common questions

Hygraph to Framer migration FAQs

Answers to the most common questions about Hygraph to Framer migration

Is Hygraph easy for non-technical editors to use?
It's decent but not great. Hygraph's editor UI is clean and approachable for basic content updates, but the moment your content model gets complex (nested components, multiple locales, lots of reference fields), editors start feeling overwhelmed. The interface slows down with large datasets, and the GraphQL-native approach means the editorial experience is shaped by developer decisions more than in other headless CMS platforms. We've set up Hygraph for teams where editors managed well after proper onboarding, but it requires more hand-holding than something like Sanity's Studio, which was designed with editorial experience as a first-class priority.
What does Hygraph cost as you scale?
Hygraph's Hobby plan is free with 3 seats, 1,000 content entries, 500K API operations, and 2 locales. The Growth plan is $199/month with 10 seats, 10,000 entries, 1M API operations, and 3 locales. Once you pass those limits, Growth charges automatic overages per block of API operations and per GB of asset traffic, so check the current rate on the pricing page before you sign. Enterprise is custom pricing and goes up to 200 seats, 1M+ entries, 50M+ API operations, and up to 80 locales, with SSO and custom roles on top. The catch is the same as it has always been. High-traffic sites burn through included operations fast, and Content Federation queries count against the limit too. Model your expected API usage before committing.
What are Hygraph's main limitations?
Three things come up on real projects. GraphQL is mandatory. There's no REST endpoint, so a REST-heavy stack means writing adapters or a BFF layer, and a team that hasn't used GraphQL faces a real ramp-up. The editor UI slows down as content grows. Big collections, dozens of fields, and double-digit locale counts make the dashboard sluggish for editors. And the paywall sits in awkward places. SSO, custom roles, and higher locale limits only arrive on Enterprise, so a mid-size team that wants proper access control jumps straight from $199/month to a sales call. None of these are dealbreakers if GraphQL is already your default and your content model stays disciplined, but they catch teams who picked Hygraph for the free tier and grew into the constraints.
How does Hygraph compare to other headless CMS options?
Hygraph's standout feature is Content Federation, which lets you pull data from external APIs into a unified GraphQL layer. That's genuinely useful if you're aggregating content from multiple sources. Compared to Contentful, Hygraph is cheaper at the lower tiers and more developer-friendly if your team already knows GraphQL. Compared to Sanity, Hygraph offers less flexibility in content modelling and lacks real-time collaboration in the editor. The free tier is generous for small projects. For larger builds, we usually recommend Sanity because the customisation ceiling is much higher and you're not locked into GraphQL as your only query language.
Can I migrate from Hygraph to Sanity?
Yes, and we do it regularly. Content extraction is the easy part since everything comes out through GraphQL queries. The bigger jobs are two. First, schema translation. Hygraph's content model maps to GraphQL types, and you rewrite those as Sanity schema definitions, then translate every GraphQL query into GROQ on the frontend. The mapping is mechanical once you've done it a few times, but it touches every page that fetches data. Second, rebuilding any Content Federation layer, because that logic lives inside Hygraph and doesn't export. If you've wired three or four external APIs through federation, you replicate those integrations in your application layer. We typically budget 4 to 8 weeks for a Hygraph to Sanity migration depending on content volume and how much federation you're untangling.
Does Framer support headless or API content delivery?
Not really. Framer renders and hosts your site on its own infrastructure, and the CMS is built to feed that frontend, not to serve content over an API to another app. There is a read API for pulling collection data out, which is enough for an export or a migration, but you can't point a separate Next.js or mobile app at Framer as a content backend the way you would with Sanity or Contentful. If you need one content source feeding a website, an app, and a few other surfaces, Framer is the wrong shape. A headless CMS is built for exactly that.


Get in touch

Tell us what you're building. We reply within one working day. Jono or someone on the team picks up every message personally.

By sending this you agree to our privacy policy. We only use your details to reply.