# WordPress to Dato CMS migration > How to migrate from WordPress to Dato CMS, with a side-by-side comparison and FAQs. --- ## Source: WordPress - **Type:** headless - **Official site:** https://wordpress.org - **Pricing:** https://wordpress.com/pricing - **Last reviewed:** 2026-07-28 ## Key advantages We're trying our hardest to think of good reasons to move to WordPress, but outside of "I like PHP errors" or trying to build a website for under £500, I honestly can't think of a good reason. If you're trying to do things on the cheap, we would highly recommend using a template from Framer or Webflow. They're better solutions in almost every way. But if you're hell-bent on building a WordPress website, we can't stop you. For that reason, we'd highly recommend SiteGround for hosting to keep it cheap and optimize the hell out of it with their performance plugin. Avoid installing tons of plugins if you can; keep it lean and simple. ### Plugins for everything You want a form? A store? A booking system? A horoscope generator for cats? WordPress has a plugin for it. Half the internet runs on "someone already built that." ### Strong community support If something breaks, someone online has already fixed it, documented it, blogged about it, and made a YouTube tutorial with dramatic background music. ### Easy to use You can be a writer, founder, or intern, you can easily build a website using WordPress. It doesn’t demand a CS degree. Click, type, publish. Done. ### Vast theme selection You might need a corporate website, minimal, or even a neon-purple-cyber-punk ecommerce store; just pick a theme and ship. Some even look good straight out of the box. ### Ideal for beginners One of the easiest ways to get a site live without knowing the difference between HTML and "the thing that makes the text bold." ### Flexible configuration options Layers of configuration, widgets, design settings, and custom plugins will only let you shape WordPress into something that actually fits your use case. ## Key pain points Talking trash about WordPress is therapy at this point. We've had to build it for years, and it's consistently awful. I guarantee that if you have used it for long enough, you've experienced a site-breaking PHP error or been locked out of your admin panel due to a faulty plugin. We know the world of horrors, and we regret adding to that share of the web. Yes, it really does power over 40% of all sites, roughly 41.5% at the last count. ### Potential security vulnerabilities When you power half the internet, the hackers notice. WordPress stays safe, but only if someone is constantly updating, patching, and watching it like a hawk, which, trust us, you don't want to. ### Heavy reliance on plugins If you want any new feature, install a new plugin. Before you know it, your site is held together by 27 plugins and a prayer that none of those plugins are removed from the market. ### Compatibility issues Themes, plugins, and core updates sometimes play nicely together, leading to surprise breakages and debugging sessions you didn’t plan for. ### Maintenance takes time WordPress doesn’t run itself. You have to run backups, security patches, plugin conflicts, and random errors. Someone has to tuck it in at night. ### Performance needs tuning WordPress sites need caching, CDN, and database optimization to stay fast, especially if you plan to scale. ### Customization has limits You think you can do a lot with themes and plugins, but when it comes to custom experiences, it means custom dev work (or going headless entirely). ## Target: Dato CMS - **Type:** headless - **Official site:** https://www.datocms.com - **Pricing:** https://www.datocms.com/pricing - **Last reviewed:** 2026-07-28 ## Key advantages DatoCMS has a low learning curve, clean UI, and a drag-and-drop schema builder that lets teams shape content without a single existential crisis. Editors love it. Developers tolerate it. Everyone gets to ship faster. The APIs are solid, the media pipeline is excellent, and the multilingual tooling is actually usable. Visual Editing, added in February 2026, means editors can now click directly on live page elements to make changes, which genuinely closes the gap with visual-first CMS tools. The JavaScript client also gained full end-to-end type safety in late 2025, with types generated from your own schema, which is a real quality-of-life win for larger teams. To be honest, it's expensive, and the drag-and-drop approach means it's not exactly winning awards for flexibility. Still, if you want something that feels polished out of the box and integrates nicely with Next.js, Shopify, and friends, DatoCMS delivers a pretty smooth experience. ### User-friendly interface DatoCMS has a clean, approachable UI that editors can pick up instantly. Little training needed, and teams can publish content without tripping over the system. ### Flexible API-based approach With both GraphQL and REST, you can query content however you prefer. It gives developers freedom to shape data flows without fighting the CMS. ### Easy framework integration DatoCMS works smoothly with popular frameworks and tools like Next.js, Astro, Svelte, and Vue. Plug it in, fetch content, and you're off. ### Efficient data retrieval The GraphQL API is fast and predictable, making it easy to pull exactly the data you need without overfetching or messy workarounds. ### Powerful image tools Dato handles image optimisation, responsive resizing, and transformations automatically. Your site stays fast without custom pipeline work. ### Real-time updates Content changes sync instantly across environments, giving teams quick feedback and reducing the "save, refresh and hope" cycle. ## Key pain points DatoCMS gives all the vibes of Prismic, but is somehow less flexible. It can feel like a glorified drag-and-drop schema builder. The moment you want to do anything mildly custom, the walls start closing in. And yes, the pricing stings. It scales fast, which is great for Dato, not so great for anyone trying to run a startup without selling a kidney. The ecosystem is small, the extensions are thin, and deeper customisation often turns into "well, I guess we're building that ourselves." There's no hard spend cap: DatoCMS confirmed overages accumulate automatically on paid plans with no way to set a budget limit, so surprise bills are a real risk. Once your project grows, you quickly realise drag-and-drop doesn't magically give you validation or extensibility. If you need something genuinely custom or long-term scalable, there are better choices. Just contact us before you start one of the most expensive journeys. ### Limited customisation options DatoCMS hits a ceiling fast if you need deeply custom logic. The drag-and-drop model is convenient, but it doesn't give you the freedom a code-first setup would. ### Pricing based on traffic Costs scale with usage, which can get painful quickly for growing sites. Traffic spikes = surprise bills, and there's no hard spending cap to protect you. ### Steeper learning curve While the UI is simple, the API-driven side demands more technical understanding. Non-developers may struggle once things get complex. ### Need for additional plugins Out-of-the-box features only go so far. More advanced workflows often require plugins or custom development to bridge gaps. ### Limited feature set scalability Great for small–mid projects, but larger, more demanding setups can outgrow what DatoCMS offers out of the box. ### Potential integration issues Certain frameworks and tools need careful configuration, and edge cases appear more often than you'd expect in more mature CMS ecosystems. ## Frequently asked questions ### How much does WordPress cost per month? WordPress.org itself is free, but hosting, themes, premium plugins, and maintenance add up quickly. Managed hosting like SiteGround looks cheap at intro pricing, around $3-8/month, then renews closer to $18-45/month. Add a premium theme ($50-200 one-time), a few paid plugins ($100-500/year), and a security solution. Realistically, you're looking at $30-100/month for a properly maintained small business site. WordPress.com's managed plans run $9/month (Personal, or $4/month billed annually) to $70/month (Commerce, or $45/month billed annually) on annual billing. Since September 2025, plugin installs work on every paid plan from Personal up, not just Business as they used to. WordPress.com Enterprise starts at $25,000/year. ### What are the best WordPress alternatives? It depends on what you're building. For marketing sites, Webflow or Framer will get you further with less pain. For content-heavy projects that need a headless CMS, Sanity is our go-to recommendation. It gives developers full control over the frontend while editors get a clean, modern interface. If you're a developer looking for alternatives specifically, Next.js paired with Sanity or even a static site generator will outperform WordPress on speed, security, and developer experience. ### How do I migrate from WordPress to a headless CMS? We start by exporting your WordPress content using WP's REST API or a database export, then restructure it for the target CMS. Posts, pages, categories, tags, media, and custom fields all get mapped to the new schema. The frontend gets rebuilt in a modern framework like Next.js. The whole process usually takes 3-6 weeks depending on how many custom post types and plugins you have. We've done this migration enough times to have solid tooling for it. ### What are the best WordPress alternatives for developers? If you're a developer tired of PHP and plugin conflicts, look at headless CMS options paired with a frontend framework. Sanity with Next.js is our top pick. You get TypeScript, version control for your content schema, and a frontend you actually enjoy working with. Strapi is another option if you want self-hosted and open-source. For simple sites, Astro with markdown content is surprisingly powerful and deploys anywhere. ### Is it worth migrating away from WordPress? For most teams we work with, yes. The maintenance burden alone costs more than people realize. Between plugin updates, security patches, performance tuning, and the occasional site-breaking PHP error, WordPress demands constant attention. Modern alternatives give you better performance, stronger security by default, and a developer experience that doesn't feel like 2010. The migration itself is an investment, but the reduced ongoing costs and improved site speed usually pay for it within 6-12 months. ### What does DatoCMS pricing look like as traffic grows? DatoCMS pricing is tied to API calls and bandwidth, which means costs scale with your traffic. The free tier includes 100k Content Delivery API calls per month and 10GB of bandwidth. Separately, the Free plan includes 25k Content Management API calls per month. The Professional plan runs €199/month on a monthly basis, or €149/month billed annually, with higher limits including 1M CDA API calls and 1TB bandwidth per month. The Enterprise tier is custom-priced. One real concern worth flagging is that there is no hard spending cap. DatoCMS confirmed in their community forum that paid plans let overages accumulate automatically with no way to set a budget limit, so a traffic spike or viral post can generate surprise bills without warning. Set up API caching aggressively and lean on static generation to keep costs predictable. If budget guardrails are critical to your team, factor that in before committing. ### Is DatoCMS good for non-technical content editors? For basic content editing, yes. DatoCMS has one of the cleaner editor interfaces in the headless CMS space. Drag-and-drop schema building means content teams can understand the structure visually, and the media library is well-designed. Visual Editing (launched February 2026 across all plans) now lets editors click directly on live page elements rather than switching to a separate preview environment, which closes a long-standing gap. The issues that remain are around scale. Editors managing content across multiple locales find the interface gets cluttered. The Structured Text editor has been noted as slow on very long documents with heavy hyperlink use (a bug patched in April 2026, so recent versions should be fine). For teams coming from WordPress or HubSpot, the shift away from WYSIWYG-first thinking is still an adjustment, but Visual Editing reduces the friction considerably.