# Sanity to Builder.io migration > How to migrate from Sanity to Builder.io, with a side-by-side comparison and FAQs. --- ## Source: Sanity - **Type:** headless - **Official site:** https://www.sanity.io - **Pricing:** https://www.sanity.io/pricing - **Last reviewed:** 2026-07-28 ## Key advantages You know where our bias' lies. We think Sanity is literally the best headless content management out there. The schema is code-based, so it can be easily versioned, scaled, and extended without a heap of third-party hoops to jump. Providing you build it with a solid foundation, which we always recommend Turbo Start Sanity, it's going to be the most valuable hub for content you can imagine. It's got a very unique tooling called the Live Content API, which in simple terms means when you press publish, its live. No issues with caching, and a single API usage that scales perfectly with multichannel content delivery. It also offers one of the best editorial experiences in the industry with Presentation and customizable content structures. We're obviously huge fans of it, and we've pivoted our business with it when we realised how ahead it is. ### Real time collaboration You write, your teammate tags in, adds citations, and updates the same doc without stepping on each other. It’s the fastest way to ship content without the "who has edit access?" chaos. ### Live preview block building With Sanity, you don’t have to guess what your page might look like. Real-time previews update the moment you type. It’s a 1:1 mirror of your site before it ever goes live, so your campaigns look right the first time. ### Meta tags, structured content Sanity’s structured content gives Google clean data and rich schema, so your pages surface higher without manual hacking. Automated schema, smarter metadata, and better rankings. ### Better media management A blazing-fast media library with first-class support for Cloudinary, Mux, Wistia and more. Upload, drag-and-drop, preview without wrestling with assets, and waiting for spins of doom. ### Automated social sharing Ever wanted to share one update, and automatically populate every social platform? Welcome to the future we've built that. Why should social media be a chore. ### Automated image generation Sanity keeps your subject centred and sharp like a tiny author thumbnail or a full-page hero banner. There are no awkward crops, or chopped heads. Your visuals just look right everywhere. ## Key pain points We obviously prefer Sanity, so much so that our own website is on Sanity. But if you don't have the right implementation team, you might find yourself in a bad situation. Its highly customizable nature can lead to complexity and time-consuming setup processes for less experienced developers. We've inherited our fair share of stinkers, but we advise that before you jump ship, you let us look over it to see if it's salvageable. That said, if you are considering moving, we can help you migrate away with automated migration scripts, web scraping, and content mapping. It'll be a 1:1 with whatever platform you choose. ### Not always plug-and-play Sanity gives you a ton of flexibility, but it’s not a "drag-and-drop" CMS. If your team prefers instant themes and presets, you’ll need a little extra setup to get started. ### Potentially high resource demand As your content model grows, Sanity gives you incredible power and real-time performance. Just keep in mind that very large projects may require a bit more horsepower behind the scenes. ### Less ideal for beginners Editors love Sanity once everything is set up, but teams switching from traditional CMSs may need a short onboarding period to learn the workflow. ### Infrastructure management needed Unlike hosted CMS platforms, you own your content pipeline. That gives you full control and scalability, but also means setup and environments need to be managed properly. ### Technical skill required Since Sanity is schema-driven, developers can model content precisely the way your business needs it. Non-technical teams benefit from that structure, but setup usually requires engineering support. ### Complexity in setup Sanity doesn’t force rigid templates or assumptions. You have to define everything like content, structure, and workflows. The tradeoff: a bit more initial setup for much more flexibility long-term. ## Target: Builder.io - **Type:** headless - **Official site:** https://www.builder.io - **Pricing:** https://www.builder.io/pricing - **Last reviewed:** 2026-07-28 ## Key advantages Builder.io occupies a unique spot in the headless CMS landscape. It is not really a traditional headless CMS in the way that Sanity or Contentful are. It is more of a visual page builder with headless capabilities bolted on. That distinction matters because if your marketing team needs to ship landing pages fast without filing Jira tickets, Builder.io genuinely delivers on that promise. The drag-and-drop editor is solid, and the ability to register your own React components so that non-developers can compose pages from your actual design system is a legitimately powerful idea. Where Builder.io really shines is in bridging the gap between developers and marketing teams. You build the components, register them with Builder, and then hand the keys over. Marketers can assemble pages, run A/B tests, and publish without touching code. For agencies like ours, this means fewer "can you just move this banner" tickets and more time spent on actual engineering work. The framework support is also genuinely broad. Next.js, React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Qwik, SolidJS, and React Native all have SDKs. If you are running a modern JavaScript stack, Builder.io probably has an integration for it. The AI features they have been shipping are interesting too, though still early days in terms of real production reliability. ### Visual drag-and-drop editor The visual editor lets non-technical users build and edit pages using your actual codebase components. It is one of the better implementations of visual editing in the headless space. ### Custom component registration Developers can register their own React, Vue, or Angular components so editors drag and drop real design system pieces rather than generic blocks. ### A/B testing and personalisation built in Native experimentation tools let marketing teams run split tests and personalise content without needing a separate optimisation platform. ### Broad framework support SDKs for Next.js, React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, Qwik, SolidJS, and React Native mean you are not locked into a single frontend framework. ### Marketing team autonomy Content and marketing teams can ship landing pages, campaign pages, and promotions independently, which frees up developer time for product work. ### Structured and visual content modes Builder.io supports both structured data models for developer-driven content and visual page building for marketing-driven content, giving teams flexibility in how they work. ## Key pain points Builder.io looks impressive in demos but the reality of day-to-day usage tells a different story. The editor can be laggy, especially with more than 30 components on a page, and we have seen reports of outright crashes that lose unsaved work. The documentation is a persistent sore point. Developers on forums describe spending days trying to get basic integrations working because the docs are outdated or incomplete. For an agency setting up projects for clients, unreliable documentation means unpredictable timelines. Pricing is another area where Builder.io catches teams off guard. The free tier exists but is quite limited, and costs ramp up quickly once you need features like roles, scheduling, or higher usage limits. We have seen complaints from freelancers and small teams about unexpected charges and slow support response times when trying to resolve billing issues. The lack of self-hosting is also a hard blocker for some clients with strict data residency requirements. The biggest concern from our perspective is vendor lock-in. Builder.io's SDKs are deeply embedded in your frontend code, and if you ever need to migrate away, you are essentially rebuilding your page composition layer from scratch. There is also no real-time collaboration, so two editors working on the same page can overwrite each other's changes without warning. ### Editor performance and stability The visual editor becomes laggy with complex pages and has been reported to crash, losing unsaved work. Teams with content-heavy pages will feel this friction daily. ### Outdated and incomplete documentation Developers consistently report that the docs are confusing, outdated, or missing critical steps. Getting started takes far longer than it should for a tool that sells itself on speed. ### Vendor lock-in risk Builder.io's SDKs are tightly coupled to your frontend. Migrating away means rebuilding your entire page building and composition layer from scratch. ### Limited collaboration tools Builder.io now offers branching and peer review workflows in its Fusion product, but true real-time co-editing is still missing. Editors working outside of the Projects workflow can still overwrite each other's changes. ### Pricing escalation Costs ramp up quickly beyond the free tier, and teams report unexpected charges. Basic features like roles and scheduling sit behind higher-priced plans. ### Slow and unresponsive support Multiple users report delayed support responses, unresolved tickets, and difficulty getting refunds or cancellations processed in a reasonable timeframe. ## Frequently asked questions ### How much does Sanity cost? Sanity's Free plan includes 20 user seats, 10,000 documents, 1M CDN API requests, 250K regular API requests, 100GB of assets, and unlimited locales. The Growth plan is $15 per seat/month for up to 50 seats, with 25,000 documents and the same API allowances, plus pay-as-you-go overages, private datasets, and 5 roles including Editor, Developer, and Contributor. Enterprise pricing is custom for organisations that need custom roles, dedicated SLAs, or single-tenant infrastructure. Most mid-size teams we work with stay well inside Growth's limits. ### What does Builder.io actually cost? Builder.io now prices per seat across its Fusion and Publish products. The free tier covers up to 5 users with limited monthly usage, which is enough to evaluate but not to run a real project. The Pro plan is $24 per user/month with pay-as-you-go usage on top, and the Team plan is $40 per user/month with proper roles, peer reviews, and higher limits. Enterprise is custom pricing with no published figures, and that's where SSO, role-based access control, and SLAs live. Historically, freelancers and small agencies on Builder's old Growth plan reported unexpected charges after exceeding usage limits, and higher tiers charged per "impression", so costs scaled with traffic in ways that weren't always predictable. Get current usage and overage terms in writing before committing.